TY  - BOOK
AU  - Purnhagen,Kai
ED  - SpringerLink (Online service)
TI  - The Politics of Systematization in EU Product Safety Regulation: Market, State, Collectivity, and Integration
T2  - Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,
SN  - 9789400765436
AV  - KJ-KKZ4999 
U1  - 341.2422 23
PY  - 2013///
CY  - Dordrecht
PB  - Springer Netherlands, Imprint: Springer
KW  - Law
KW  - Modern philosophy
KW  - Political science
KW  - Philosophy
KW  - Private international law
KW  - Conflict of laws
KW  - International law
KW  - Comparative law
KW  - European Law
KW  - Philosophy of Law
KW  - Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History
KW  - Modern Philosophy
KW  - Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law
KW  - Fundamentals of Law
N1  - Table of Contents -- Abbreviations -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- Chapter 1: Mapping the Systematization of EU Product Safety Law -- Chapter 2: Mapping Systematization in EU Law -- Chapter 3: Systematization of EU Product Safety Law – Governing the EU Market State -- Chapter 4: Systematization of EU Product Safety Law and European Primary Law -- Epilogue -- Bibliography -- Court Decisions -- Bibliography -- Court Decisions -- Bibliography -- Index
N2  - This book examines the increasing role of the legal method of systematisation in European Union (EU) law. It argues that the legal method of systematisation that has been developed in a welfare-state context is increasingly used as a regulative tool to functionally integrate the market. The book uses the example of EU product regulation as a reference to illustrate the impact of systematisation on EU law. It draws conclusions from this phenomenon and redefines the current place and origin of systematisation in the EU legal system. It puts forward and demonstrates two main arguments. First, in certain sectors such as in EU product safety law, the quality of EU law changes from a sector-specific and reactive field of law to an increasingly coherent legal system at European level. Therefore, instead of punctual market intervention, it increasingly governs whole market areas. By doing so, it challenges and often fully replaces the respective welfare-based legal systems in the Member States for the benefit of the ideal of a market-driven EU legal system. Second, at European level, the ideal is in development. This illustrates the change of the function of Statecraft from nation-states to market-states
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6543-6
ER  -