000			03005nam a22004217a 4500
001			sulb-eb0013247
003			BD-SySUS
005			20160404145047.0
008			131127r20132013dcu o 00 0 eng d
020			_a9780815724865
020			_a0815724861
020			_z9780815724858
040			_aMdBmJHUP _cMdBmJHUP
050		4	_aUA23 _b.O386 2013
082	0	4	_a355/.033573 _223
100	1		_aO'Hanlon, Michael E., _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aHealing the wounded giant _h[electronic resource] : _bmaintaining military preeminence while cutting the defense budget / _cMichael E. O'Hanlon.
260			_aBaltimore, Maryland : _bProject Muse, _c2013 _e(Baltimore, Md. : _fProject MUSE, _g2015)
260			_aWashington, D.C. : _bBrookings Institution Press, _c[2013] _e(Baltimore, Md. : _fProject MUSE, _g2015)
300			_a1 online resource (1 PDF (xv, 100 pages) :) _billustrations
500			_aIssued as part of UPCC book collections on Project MUSE.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_aAmerican military strategy and grand strategy -- Army and Marine Corps force structure -- Air Force and Navy Force structure -- Modernization -- Nuclear weapons, missile defense, and intelligence -- Military compensation and Pentagon reforms -- Conclusion-and the implications of prolonged sequestration or the equivalent -- Appendix.
520			_aPresident Barack Obama survived a tenuous economy and a toxic political environment to win re-election in 2012, but the bitter partisan divide in Washington survived as well. So did the country's huge fiscal deficit. in this, the latest in a long line of Brookings Institution analyses of the defense budget, Michael O'Hanlon considers how best to balance national security and fiscal responsibility during a period of prolonged economic stress and political acrimony --even as the world remains unsettled, from Afghanistan to Iran to Syria to the western Pacific region. O'Hanlon explains why the large defense cuts that would result from prolonged sequestration or from deficit-reduction projects such as the Bowles-Simpson plan are too deep. But the bulk of his book represents an effort to look for greater savings than the Obama administration's 2012 proposals would allow.
588			_aDescription based on print version record.
610	1	0	_aUnited States. _bDepartment of Defense _xAppropriations and expenditures.
650		0	_aNational security _zUnited States _xFinance.
651		0	_aUnited States _xPolitics and government _y2009-
651		0	_aUnited States _xMilitary policy.
651		0	_aUnited States _xArmed Forces _xAppropriations and expenditures.
655		0	_aElectronic books.
655		7	_aElectronic books. _2local
710	2		_aProject Muse, _edistributor.
776	0	8	_iPrint version: _w(DLC) 2013010929 _z0815724853 _z9780815724858
710	2		_aProject Muse.
856	4	0	_zFull text available: _uhttps://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780815724865/
942			_2Dewey Decimal Classification _ceBooks
999			_c34538 _d34538