000 | 01977nam a22003017a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | sulb-eb0017497 | ||
003 | BD-SySUS | ||
005 | 20160405140659.0 | ||
008 | 100506s2010||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d | ||
020 | _a9780511761164 (ebook) | ||
020 | _z9780521191531 (hardback) | ||
020 | _z9780521139267 (paperback) | ||
040 |
_aUkCbUP _beng _erda _cUkCbUP _dBD-SySUS. |
||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aKF4208.5.S34 _bR38 2011 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a231.7/652 _222 |
100 | 1 |
_aRavitch, Frank S., _eauthor. |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aMarketing Intelligent Design : _bLaw and the Creationist Agenda / _cFrank S. Ravitch. |
264 | 1 |
_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2010. |
|
300 |
_a1 online resource (360 pages) : _bdigital, PDF file(s). |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
500 | _aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 04 Apr 2016). | ||
520 | _aRecently a new battle has emerged between science and religion. The battle has focused on intelligent design (ID) and the numerous legal, philosophical and educational concerns surrounding it. Resolution of these concerns centers on two questions: Is ID science? And is ID religion? Despite the fact that ID does not meet the standards of scientific rigor, ID proponents have been able to create a remarkably well-designed marketing plan aimed at imposing a theistic naturalism in schools and scientific discourse. Both the ID movement and some of its most vociferous opponents have a vested interest in suggesting that science, especially evolutionary biology, and religion are incompatible. This book presents a philosophical and legal counterpoint by demonstrating the compatibility between religion and evolutionary biology and the incompatibility between ID and mainstream science. | ||
776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _z9780521191531 |
856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761164 |
942 |
_2Dewey Decimal Classification _ceBooks |
||
999 |
_c38935 _d38935 |