000			03670nam a22005417a 4500
001			sulb-eb0023195
003			BD-SySUS
005			20160413122339.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			130615s2013 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783319001340 _9978-3-319-00134-0
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-319-00134-0 _2doi
050		4	_aK5459
072		7	_aLNAC5 _2bicssc
072		7	_aLAW006000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a347.09 _223
100	1		_aSynková, Sandra. _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aCourts' Inquiry into Arbitral Jurisdiction at the Pre-Award Stage _h[electronic resource] : _bA Comparative Analysis of the English, German and Swiss Legal Order / _cby Sandra Synková.
264		1	_aHeidelberg : _bSpringer International Publishing : _bImprint: Springer, _c2013.
300			_aXVII, 309 p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0		_aIntroduction -- Functional Equivalents for Comparison -- Theoretical Underpinnings of Arbitral Jurisdiction -- Competence-Competence -- The New York Convention and the Obligation to Recognise and Enforce Arbitration Agreements -- The Application of Section 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (England) -- The Application of § 1032(1) of the German Code of Civil Procedure (Germany) -- The Application of Article 7 of the Swiss Private International Law Act (Switzerland) -- Conclusion, Evaluation and Future Perspectives.
520			_aInternational arbitration has become the favored method of resolving disputes between business partners in almost every aspect of international trade, commerce, and investment. The resolution of a dispute by means of international arbitration provides the parties with an opportunity to resolve their disputes in a private, confidential, cost and time efficient manner before a neutral tribunal of their choice. However, challenges to arbitral jurisdiction have become a common practice in the field. Resolution of such challenges may significantly delay the resolution of the parties’ primary substantive dispute, increase overall dispute resolution costs and even whittle down the benefits of the parties’ bargain to arbitrate. Accordingly, adopting a proper approach to the resolution of such disputes becomes crucial to the efficacy of international arbitration as a system of dispute resolution. The present book provides a comparative analysis of the practice of three carefully selected legal orders: the English, German and Swiss and outlines possible ways forward. As the work strikes a balance between theory and practice, it will appeal to practitioners, researchers, but also students looking to develop their understanding of the international arbitration field.
650		0	_aLaw.
650		0	_aCivil procedure.
650		0	_aPrivate international law.
650		0	_aConflict of laws.
650		0	_aInternational law.
650		0	_aComparative law.
650		0	_aMediation.
650		0	_aDispute resolution (Law).
650		0	_aConflict management.
650	1	4	_aLaw.
650	2	4	_aDispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration.
650	2	4	_aPrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law.
650	2	4	_aCivil Procedure Law.
650	2	4	_aEuropean Law.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783319001333
856	4	0	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00134-0
912			_aZDB-2-SHU
942			_2Dewey Decimal Classification _ceBooks
999			_c45287 _d45287