000 | 03244nam a22005417a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | sulb-eb0024078 | ||
003 | BD-SySUS | ||
005 | 20160413122423.0 | ||
007 | cr nn 008mamaa | ||
008 | 121026s2013 gw | s |||| 0|eng d | ||
020 |
_a9783642323881 _9978-3-642-32388-1 |
||
024 | 7 |
_a10.1007/978-3-642-32388-1 _2doi |
|
050 | 4 | _aKZ7000-7500 | |
072 | 7 |
_aLBBZ _2bicssc |
|
072 | 7 |
_aLAW051000 _2bisacsh |
|
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a345 _223 |
100 | 1 |
_aHallevy, Gabriel. _eauthor. |
|
245 | 1 | 4 |
_aThe Right to Be Punished _h[electronic resource] : _bModern Doctrinal Sentencing / _cby Gabriel Hallevy. |
264 | 1 |
_aBerlin, Heidelberg : _bSpringer Berlin Heidelberg : _bImprint: Springer, _c2013. |
|
300 |
_aXVI, 236 p. _bonline resource. |
||
336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
347 |
_atext file _bPDF _2rda |
||
505 | 0 | _aPunishment as Part of Modern Criminal Law Theory -- General Purposes of Punishment -- General Considerations of Punishment -- General Structure of Doctrinal Sentencing -- Physical Punishments -- Economic Punishments -- Conclusion. | |
520 | _aDoes an offender have the right to be punished? "The right to be punished" may sound like an oxymoron, but it is not necessarily so. With the emergence of modern criminal law, the offender gained the right to be punished by rational criminal law rather than being lynched by an angry mob. The present-day offender may have the right to be punished by doctrinal sentencing rather than being subjected to verdicts based on vague, unclear, and uncertain principles. In modern criminal law, the imposition of criminal liability follows accurate and strict rules, whereas there are no similar rules for the imposition of punishment. The process of sentencing is vague and obscure, as are the considerations used for the imposition of punishments. The objective of the present book is to propose a comprehensive, general, and legally sophisticated theory of modern doctrinal sentencing. The challenges of such a legal theory are plenty and complex. In addition to increasing clarity and certainty, modern doctrinal sentencing must deal with modern types of delinquency (e.g. organized crime, recidivism, corporate offenders, high-tech offenses, etc.) and modern principles of criminal law. Modern doctrinal sentencing must serve to ensure optimal sentencing. | ||
650 | 0 | _aLaw. | |
650 | 0 | _aPolitical science. | |
650 | 0 |
_aLaw _xPhilosophy. |
|
650 | 0 | _aConstitutional law. | |
650 | 0 | _aHuman rights. | |
650 | 0 | _aInternational criminal law. | |
650 | 0 | _aCriminology. | |
650 | 1 | 4 | _aLaw. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aInternational Criminal Law. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aCriminology & Criminal Justice. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aHuman Rights. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aPhilosophy of Law. |
650 | 2 | 4 | _aConstitutional Law. |
710 | 2 | _aSpringerLink (Online service) | |
773 | 0 | _tSpringer eBooks | |
776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrinted edition: _z9783642323874 |
856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32388-1 |
912 | _aZDB-2-SHU | ||
942 |
_2Dewey Decimal Classification _ceBooks |
||
999 |
_c46170 _d46170 |