000			03640nam a22004937a 4500
001			sulb-eb0024095
003			BD-SySUS
005			20160413122424.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			121213s2013 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9783642325014 _9978-3-642-32501-4
024	7		_a10.1007/978-3-642-32501-4 _2doi
050		4	_aKZ7000-7500
072		7	_aLBBZ _2bicssc
072		7	_aLAW051000 _2bisacsh
082	0	4	_a345 _223
100	1		_aGrover, Sonja C. _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aHumanity’s Children _h[electronic resource] : _bICC Jurisprudence and the Failure to Address the Genocidal Forcible Transfer of Children / _cby Sonja C. Grover.
264		1	_aBerlin, Heidelberg : _bSpringer Berlin Heidelberg : _bImprint: Springer, _c2013.
300			_aXII, 324 p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
505	0		_aPart I Introduction: Reconsidering the Legal Concepts of Genocide and the ‘Genocidal Forcible Transfer of Children’ -- Part II ICC Prosecutor Case Selec-tion and Charging Decisionn: Gravity and Interests of Justice Considerations -- Part III Selected ICC Cases Illustrating the Failure to Address the Genocidal Forcible Transfer of Children: Case 1: Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo -- Case 2: Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui -- Case 3: Prosecutor v Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir -- Part IV Conclusion: The Geno-cidal Forcible Transfer of Children: A Crime Well Established in International Law; Yet Still Not Prosecuted by the ICC.
520			_aThis book addresses the phenomenon of children as the particular targets of extreme cruelty and genocide during armed conflict. Selected International Criminal Court cases are analyzed to illustrate the ICC‘s failure to address the genocidal forcible transfer of children to armed State and/or non-State groups or forces perpetrating mass atrocities and/or genocide. An original legal interpretation of children as a protected group in the context of the genocide provision of the Rome Statute is provided. The work also examines certain examples of the various modes in which armed State and/or non-State groups or forces perpetrating mass atrocities and/or genocide appropriate children and accomplish the genocidal forcible transfer of children to the perpetrator group. It is argued that the failure to prosecute the genocidal forcible transfer of children through the ICC mechanisms (where the Court has jurisdiction and the State has failed to meet its obligations in this regard) undermines the perceived gravity of this heinous international crime within the international community. Furthermore, this ICC failure to prosecute conflicts with the interests of justice and ultimately results in an erosion of the respect for the personhood and human dignity of children.
650		0	_aLaw.
650		0	_aInternational relations.
650		0	_aHuman rights.
650		0	_aInternational humanitarian law.
650		0	_aInternational criminal law.
650	1	4	_aLaw.
650	2	4	_aInternational Criminal Law.
650	2	4	_aInternational Humanitarian Law, Law of Armed Conflict.
650	2	4	_aHuman Rights.
650	2	4	_aInternational Relations.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9783642325007
856	4	0	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32501-4
912			_aZDB-2-SHU
942			_2Dewey Decimal Classification _ceBooks
999			_c46187 _d46187