000 03503nam a22005897a 4500
001 sulb-eb0026457
003 BD-SySUS
005 20160413122649.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 121116s2013 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9789400752795
_9978-94-007-5279-5
024 7 _a10.1007/978-94-007-5279-5
_2doi
050 4 _aK201-487
050 4 _aB65
050 4 _aK140-165
072 7 _aLAB
_2bicssc
072 7 _aLAW079000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aPHI021000
_2bisacsh
082 0 4 _a340.1
_223
100 1 _aDouard, John.
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aMonstrous Crimes and the Failure of Forensic Psychiatry
_h[electronic resource] /
_cby John Douard, Pamela D. Schultz.
264 1 _aDordrecht :
_bSpringer Netherlands :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2013.
300 _aXVI, 200 p.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aInternational Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine,
_x1567-8008 ;
_v53
520 _aThe metaphor of the monster or predator—usually a sexual predator, drug dealer in areas frequented by children, or psychopathic murderer—is a powerful framing device in public discourse about how the criminal justice system should respond to serious violent crimes. The cultural history of the monster reveals significant features of the metaphor that raise questions about the extent to which justice can be achieved in both the punishment of what are regarded as "monstrous crimes" and the treatment of those who commit such crimes. This volume is the first to address the connections between the history of the monster metaphor, the 19th century idea of the criminal as monster, and the 20th century conception of the psychopath: the new monster. The book addresses, in particular, the ways in which the metaphor is used to scapegoat certain categories of crimes and criminals for anxieties about our own potential for deviant, and, indeed, dangerous interests. These interests have long been found to be associated with the fascination people have for monsters in most cultures, including the West. The book concludes with an analysis of the role of forensic psychiatrists and psychologists in representing criminal defendants as psychopaths, or persons with certain personality disorders. As psychiatry and psychology have transformed bad behavior into mad behavior, these institutions have taken on the legal role of helping to sort out the most dangerous among us for preventive "treatment" rather than carceral "punishment.".
650 0 _aLaw.
650 0 _aEthics.
650 0 _aPsychiatry.
650 0 _aLaw
_xPhilosophy.
650 0 _aPersonality.
650 0 _aSocial psychology.
650 0 _aPsychology.
650 1 4 _aLaw.
650 2 4 _aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.
650 2 4 _aPsychiatry.
650 2 4 _aLaw and Psychology.
650 2 4 _aPersonality and Social Psychology.
650 2 4 _aEthics.
700 1 _aSchultz, Pamela D.
_eauthor.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer eBooks
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9789400752788
830 0 _aInternational Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine,
_x1567-8008 ;
_v53
856 4 0 _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5279-5
912 _aZDB-2-SHU
942 _2Dewey Decimal Classification
_ceBooks
999 _c48549
_d48549