Imagined Causes: Hume's Conception of Objects [electronic resource] / by Stefanie Rocknak.

By:

Rocknak, Stefanie [author.]

Contributor(s):

SpringerLink (Online service)

Material type: Text

TextSeries: The New Synthese Historical Library ; 71Publisher: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 2013Description: XVI, 292 p. online resourceContent type:

text

Media type:

computer

Carrier type:

online resource

ISBN:

9789400721876

Subject(s):

Additional physical formats: Printed edition:: No titleDDC classification:

180-190 23

LOC classification:

B108-5802

Online resources:

Click here to access online

Contents:

General Introduction.- PART I: LAYING THE GROUNDWORK.- 1. Four Distinctions.- 2. Elementary Belief, Causally-Produced Belief and the Natural Relation of Causality -- 3. The Two Systems of Reality -- PART II: PERFECT IDENTITY AND THE TRANSCENDENTAL IMAGINATION -- 4. Proto-Objects -- 5. The First Account of Transcendental Perfect Identity: The Foundation of Secret Causes -- 6. A Mysterious Kind of Causation: The Second Account of Transcendental Perfect Identity -- 7. Unity, Number and Time: The Third Account of Transcendental Perfect Identity.- PART III: IMAGINING CAUSES IN REACTION TO THE VULGAR: A PURELY PHILOSOPHICAL ENDEAVOR -- 8. The Vulgar Attempt to Achieve Perfect Identity -- 9. The Philosopher’s Reaction to the Vulgar: Imagined Causes Revisited -- 10. Personal Identity.- PART IV: JUSTIFICATION -- 11. Three Unjustified Instances of Imagined Causes: Substances, Primary Qualities and the Soul as an Immaterial Object -- 12. Conclusion.- Bibliography -- Index.

In: Springer eBooksSummary: This book provides the first comprehensive account of Hume’s conception of objects in Book I of A Treatise of Human Nature. What, according to Hume, are objects? Ideas? Impressions? Mind-independent objects? All three? None of the above? Through a close textual analysis, Rocknak shows that Hume thought that objects are imagined ideas. But, she argues, he struggled with two accounts of how and when we imagine such ideas. On the one hand, Hume believed that we always and universally imagine that objects are the causes of our perceptions. On the other hand, he thought that we only imagine such causes when we reach a “philosophical” level of thought. This tension manifests itself in Hume’s account of personal identity; a tension that, Rocknak argues, Hume acknowledges in the Appendix to the Treatise. As a result of Rocknak’s detailed account of Hume’s conception of objects, we are forced to accommodate new interpretations of, at least, Hume’s notions of belief, personal identity, justification and causality.

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

No physical items for this record

This book provides the first comprehensive account of Hume’s conception of objects in Book I of A Treatise of Human Nature. What, according to Hume, are objects? Ideas? Impressions? Mind-independent objects? All three? None of the above? Through a close textual analysis, Rocknak shows that Hume thought that objects are imagined ideas. But, she argues, he struggled with two accounts of how and when we imagine such ideas. On the one hand, Hume believed that we always and universally imagine that objects are the causes of our perceptions. On the other hand, he thought that we only imagine such causes when we reach a “philosophical” level of thought. This tension manifests itself in Hume’s account of personal identity; a tension that, Rocknak argues, Hume acknowledges in the Appendix to the Treatise. As a result of Rocknak’s detailed account of Hume’s conception of objects, we are forced to accommodate new interpretations of, at least, Hume’s notions of belief, personal identity, justification and causality.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.